Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Cureus ; 15(2): e35437, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2274981

ABSTRACT

Introduction Prone positioning during ventilation is recommended for patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the efficacy of first-session prone positioning in improving short-term outcomes remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the impact of the rate of change in partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen (P/F) ratio before and after initial prone positioning on activities of daily living (ADL) and outcomes at discharge. Methods In this retrospective chart review, 22 patients with severe COVID-19 who required ventilator management between April and September 2021 were analyzed. Patients with an improvement in the P/F ratio (after initial prone positioning, compared to that before the session) by > 16mHg and < 16mmHg were defined as responders and non-responders, respectively. Results Compared with non-responders, responders had a significantly shorter ventilator duration, a higher Barthel Index at discharge, and a higher proportion of discharged patients. There was a significant between-group difference in chronic respiratory comorbidities, with one case (7.7%) among responders and six cases (66.7%) among non-responders. Conclusions This study is the first of its kind to investigate short-term outcomes in patients with COVID-19 requiring ventilator management after initial prone positioning. After initial prone positioning, responders had higher P/F ratios as well as improved ADLs and outcomes at discharge.

2.
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban ; 47(12): 1695-1703, 2022 Dec 28.
Article in English, Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2232513

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in elderly and patients with chronic respiratory diseases (COPD) had a poor prognosis. COPD is one of the most common chronic respiratory diseases. We explore the epidemiological characteristics of patients with severe COVID-19 with COPD patients in order to provide medical evidence for the prevention and treatment of severe COVID-19. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical baseline characteristics, treatment strategies, disease progression and prognosis of 557 severe COVID-19 patients admitted to the West Court of Union Hospital of Huazhong University of Science and Technology from January 29, 2020 to April 8, 2020. RESULTS: A total of 465 patients with severe COVID-19 were enrolled in the study, including 248 (53.3%) males and 217 (46.7%) females. The median age of severe COVID-19 patients was 62.0 years, and 53 patients were complicated with COPD. Common symptoms at the onset included fever (78.5%), dry cough (67.1%), shortness of breath (47.3%) and fatigue (40.9%). Compared with non-COPD patients, patients with COPD had significantly lower levels of SpO2 in admission (90.0% vs 92.0%, P=0.014). In terms of laboratory examinations, patients with COPD had higher levels of C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, procalcitonin, total bilirubin, blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, lipoprotein (a), high-sensitivity troponin I, and D-dimer, while had lower levels of platelet counts, albumin and apolipoprotein AI. Severe COVID-19 patients with COPD had higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores [3.0(2.0, 3.0) vs 2.0(2.0, 3.0), P=0.038] and CURB-65 score [1.0(1.0, 2.0) vs1.0(0.0, 1.0), P<0.001], and a higher proportion of progressing to critical illness (28.3% vs 10.0%, P<0.001) with more complications [e.g. septic shock (15.1% vs 6.1%, P=0.034)], had higher incidence rates of antibiotic therapies (90.6% vs 77.2%, P=0.025), non-invasive (11.3% vs 1.7%, P<0.001) and invasive mechanical ventilation (17.0% vs 8.3%, P=0.039), ICU admission (17.0% vs 7.5%, P=0.021) and death (15.1% vs 6.1%, P=0.016). Cox proportion hazard model was carried out, and the results showed that comorbid COPD was an independent risk factor for severe COVID-19 patients progressing to critical type, after adjusting for age and gender [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR)=2.38(1.30-4.37), P=0.005] and additionally adjusting for chronic kidney diseases, hypertension, coronary heart disease [AHR=2.63(1.45-4.77), P<0.001], or additionally adjusting for some statistically significant laboratory findings [AHR=2.10(1.13-3.89), P=0.018]. CONCLUSIONS: Severe COVID-19 patients with COPD have higher levels of disease severity, proportion of progression to critical illness and mortality rate. Individualized treatment strategies should be adopted to improve the prognosis of severe COVID-19 patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Male , Female , Humans , Aged , Middle Aged , COVID-19/complications , SARS-CoV-2 , Retrospective Studies , Critical Illness , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/complications , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/epidemiology
3.
Rigakuryoho Kagaku ; 37(6):627-633, 2022.
Article in Japanese | Scopus | ID: covidwho-2197435

ABSTRACT

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to elucidate the effect of prone positioning on the respiratory function of patients with the severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) which emerged in 2019. [Participants and Methods] We examined 24 COVID-19 patients who underwent mechanical ventilation at the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center from March 2020 to November 2021. The respiratory function of these patients before and after prone positioning was compared. The indices of respiratory function were the P/F ratio obtained from the blood data and peak pressure (Ppeak), positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP), delta P (⊿P), and static compliance (Cstat) displayed on the graphic monitor of the ventilator. [Results] After prone positioning, significant increases in the P/F ratio and Cstat were observed. Although Ppeak, PEEP and ⊿P decreased, their differences were not significant. [Conclusion] The results of this study demonstrate that prone positioning was effective at contributing to improvement of the respiratory status of patients with severe COVID-19. © 2022, Society of Physical Therapy Science (Rigaku Ryoho Kagakugakkai). All rights reserved.

4.
Artif Organs ; 2022 Nov 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2136653

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia experience hyperglycemia. It is often difficult to control blood glucose (BG) levels in such patients using standard intravenous insulin infusion therapy. Therefore, we used an artificial pancreas. This study aimed to compare the BG status of the artificial pancreas with that of standard therapy. METHODS: Fifteen patients were included in the study. BG values and the infusion speed of insulin and glucose by the artificial pancreas were collected. Arterial BG and administration rates of insulin, parenteral sugar, and enteral sugar were recorded during the artificial pancreas and standard therapy. The target BG level was 200 mg/dl. RESULTS: Arterial BG was highly correlated with BG data from the artificial pancreas. A higher BG slightly increased the difference between the BG data from the artificial pancreas and arterial BS. No significant difference in arterial BG was observed between the artificial pancreas and standard therapy. However, the standard deviation with the artificial pancreas was smaller than that under standard therapy (p < 0.0001). More points within the target BG range were achieved with the artificial pancreas (180-220 mg/dl) than under standard therapy. The hyperglycemic index of the artificial pancreas (8.7 ± 15.6 mg/dl) was lower than that of standard therapy (16.0 ± 21.5 mg/dl) (p = 0.0387). No incidence of hypoglycemia occurred under the artificial pancreas. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of achieving target BG was higher using artificial pancreas than with standard therapy. An artificial pancreas helps to control BG in critically ill patients.

5.
Asian Journal of Water Environment and Pollution ; 19(5):37-42, 2022.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-2071052

ABSTRACT

Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a viral pathogen that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), as a receptor, is crucial for SARS-CoV-2 to get access into the host cells. According to reports, ACE2 is expressed in the liver, placenta, heart, lungs and kidneys. This study sought to gain unique insights into the features of liver indicators in individuals suffering from COVID-19 disease in order to enhance their therapeutic care. The study groups included 50 people diagnosed with COVID-19 infection in the patient's group and 25 healthy people without any systemic diseases in the control group. Human serum samples were used to measure liver function enzymes, CRP, D dimer, and ferritin all samples by using automated quantitative tests. The results revealed a statically significant difference between AST, ALP, TSB, and study groups, where it is found that the mean levels of AST (88.04 +/- 33.00) and ALP (99.61 +/- 41.93) were high in patients than in controls, while the mean levels of TSB were low in patients (0.51 +/- 0.21) than the controls. A significant difference was also obtained for each ferritin, CRP, and D dimer between the study groups, where it found the mean concentrations of D dimer, ferritin and CRP, i.e., 1208.09 +/- 667.32, 60.53 +/- 23.91 and 204.52 +/- 90.62, respectively, were high in the patient's group than in controls.

6.
J Infect Chemother ; 28(1): 19-23, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1401624

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Approximately 5% of patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 develop severe COVID-19. Severe COVID-19 requires respiratory management with mechanical ventilation and an extended period of treatment. Prolonged infectious virus shedding is a concern in severe COVID-19 cases, but few reports have examined the duration of infectious virus shedding. Therefore, we investigated the duration of infectious virus shedding in patients transferred to Hiroshima University Hospital with severe COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation. METHODS: Nasopharyngeal swab specimens were collected and analyzed using both viral culture and reverse transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) tests between December 2020 and February 2021. RESULTS: Of the 23 patients tested, the proportions of those with positive test results at first specimen collection (the median number of days to first specimen collection after symptom onset was 10) on RT-qPCR and viral culture tests were 95·7% and 30·4%, respectively. All six patients with positive viral culture test results who were followed-up tested negative 24 days after symptom onset but remained positive on RT-qPCR. Viral loads based on PCR testing did not decrease over time, but those determined via culture tests decreased over time. The longest negative conversion time was observed in a dialysis patient on immunosuppressive drugs. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated that patients with severe COVID-19 remain culture positive for ≥ 10 days after symptom onset. Additionally, immunosuppressed patients with severe COVID-19 could consider isolation for ≥ 20 days.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , RNA, Viral/genetics , Respiration, Artificial , SARS-CoV-2 , Viral Load , Virus Shedding
7.
Front Immunol ; 11: 596553, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-979020

ABSTRACT

The severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection has been related to uncontrolled inflammatory innate responses and impaired adaptive immune responses mostly due to exhausted T lymphocytes and lymphopenia. In this work we have characterized the nature of the lymphopenia and demonstrate a set of factors that hinder the effective control of virus infection and the activation and arming of effector cytotoxic T CD8 cells and showing signatures defining a high-risk population. We performed immune profiling of the T helper (Th) CD4+ and T CD8+ cell compartments in peripheral blood of 144 COVID-19 patients using multiparametric flow cytometry analysis. On the one hand, there was a consistent lymphopenia with an overrepresentation of non-functional T cells, with an increased percentage of naive Th cells (CD45RA+, CXCR3-, CCR4-, CCR6-, CCR10-) and persistently low frequency of markers associated with Th1, Th17, and Th1/Th17 memory-effector T cells compared to healthy donors. On the other hand, the most profound alteration affected the Th1 subset, which may explain the poor T cells responses and the persistent blood virus load. Finally, the decrease in Th1 cells may also explain the low frequency of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells that express the HLA-DR and CD38 activation markers observed in numerous patients who showed minimal or no lymphocyte activation response. We also identified the percentage of HLA-DR+CD4+ T cells, PD-1+CD+4/CD8+ T cells in blood, and the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio as useful factors for predicting critical illness and fatal outcome in patients with confirmed COVID-19.


Subject(s)
CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , COVID-19/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer/immunology , Th1 Cells/immunology , ADP-ribosyl Cyclase 1/immunology , ADP-ribosyl Cyclase 1/metabolism , Aged , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/metabolism , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/metabolism , COVID-19/virology , Cell Differentiation/immunology , Female , HLA-DR Antigens/immunology , HLA-DR Antigens/metabolism , Humans , Lymphocyte Activation/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer/metabolism , Th1 Cells/metabolism , Th17 Cells/immunology , Th17 Cells/metabolism
8.
Journal of Sun Yat-sen University(Medical Sciences) ; (6): 161-173, 2020.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM (Western Pacific), WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: covidwho-863531

ABSTRACT

@#An outbreak of new infectious disease caused by novel coronavirus (COVID- 19)started in China last year,which mainly leads to pulmonary injuries. The medical workers of the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University quickly responded to the calls and three medical teams had been dispatched to epidemic area to join the fight against the novel coronavirus. The team creatively established the advanced life support units in general wards in order to rescue the critically ill patients. Hundreds of severe cases had been diagnosed and treated by our medical teams. To standardize the diagnosis and treatment of this new infectious disease ,especially the severe cases,guidelines for the diagnosis and management of COVID-19 is compiled by the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University.

9.
Rev Invest Clin ; 72(3): 159-164, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-617018

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The ideal treatment of coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 has yet to be defined, but convalescent plasma (CoPla) has been successfully employed. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to study the safety and outcomes of the administration of CoPla to individuals with severe COVID-19 in an academic medical center. METHODS: Ten patients were prospectively treated with plasma from COVID-19 convalescent donors. RESULTS: Over 8 days, the sequential organ failure assessment score dropped significantly in all patients, from 3 to 1.5 (p = 0.014); the Kirby index (PaO2/FiO2) score increased from 124 to 255, (p < 0.0001), body temperature decreased significantly from 38.1 to 36.9°C (p = 0.0058), and ferritin levels also dropped significantly from 1736.6 to 1061.8 ng/ml (p = 0.0001). Chest X-rays improved in 7/10 cases and in 6/10, computerized tomography scans also revealed improvement of the lung injury. Decreases in C-reactive protein and D-dimer levels were also observed. Three of five patients on mechanical ventilation support could be extubated, nine were transferred to conventional hospital floors, and six were sent home; two patients died. The administration of CoPla had no side effects and the 24-day overall survival was 77%. CONCLUSIONS: Although other treatments were also administered to the patients and as a result data are difficult to interpret, it seems that the addition of CoPla improved pulmonary function.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Adult , Aged , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Betacoronavirus/immunology , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , Biomarkers , Body Temperature , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , COVID-19 , Combined Modality Therapy , Convalescence , Coronavirus Infections/blood , Coronavirus Infections/diagnostic imaging , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Female , Ferritins/blood , Humans , Immunization, Passive , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pilot Projects , Plasma , Pneumonia, Viral/blood , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnostic imaging , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Prospective Studies , Respiration, Artificial , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , COVID-19 Serotherapy
10.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev ; 37(2): e3377, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-615189

ABSTRACT

The outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) has become an evolving worldwide health crisis. With the rising prevalence of obesity and diabetes has come an increasing awareness of their impacts on infectious diseases, including increased risk for various infections, post-infection complications and mortality from critical infections. Although epidemiological and clinical characteristics of Covid-19 have been constantly reported, no article has systematically illustrated the role of obesity and diabetes in Covid-19, or how Covid-19 affects obesity and diabetes, or special treatment in these at-risk populations. Here, we present a synthesis of the recent advances in our understanding of the relationships between obesity, diabetes and Covid-19 along with the underlying mechanisms, and provide special treatment guidance for these at-risk populations.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/pathology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Obesity/epidemiology , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/therapy , Comorbidity , Critical Illness/epidemiology , Critical Illness/therapy , Diabetes Complications/diagnosis , Diabetes Complications/epidemiology , Diabetes Complications/pathology , Diabetes Complications/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Humans , Obesity/complications , Obesity/diagnosis , Obesity/therapy , Pandemics , Prevalence , Prognosis , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL